20:20 for 2020 - Four Torah Verses


Just for fun, in honor of 2020, here are all the 20:20 verses in the Torah (Note: Genesis 20 only goes to v.18), plus some thoughts, and related pieces from TheTorah.com.

Exod 20:20 (23)

לֹא תַעֲשׂוּן אִתִּי אֱלֹהֵי כֶסֶף וֵאלֹהֵי זָהָב לֹא תַעֲשׂוּ לָכֶם׃

With Me, therefore, you shall not make any gods of silver,
nor shall you make for yourselves any gods of gold.

Par. Yitro, just after the 10 Commandments are given. Why is there an idolatry prohibition so soon after the 2nd Commandment? Rashi quotes a midrash that this verse contains prohibitions relating to the Cherubim. Some academic scholars suggest that this verse and the next several laws comprise a different version of what was on the tablets (e.g. W. Propp, AB). See Understanding Idolatry by Dr. Uri Gabbay.

Lev 20:20

וְאִישׁ אֲשֶׁר יִשְׁכַּב אֶת־דֹּדָתוֹ עֶרְוַת דֹּדוֹ גִּלָּה חֶטְאָם יִשָּׂאוּ עֲרִירִים יָמֻתוּ׃

If a man lies with his uncle’s wife, it is his uncle’s nakedness that he has uncovered. They shall bear their guilt: they shall die childless.

Par. Kedoshim, in a list of forbidden sexual relations. We had a similar list in Lev 18. Why a second one? Some consider this list to comprise the "punishments," but others see it as a different law collection altogether (e.g. Berlin & Brettler, JSB). See Which Relatives Are You Prohibited from Marrying? by Prof. Rabbi Marty Lockshin.

Num 20:20

וַיֹּאמֶר לֹא תַעֲבֹר וַיֵּצֵא אֱדוֹם לִקְרָאתוֹ בְּעַם כָּבֵד וּבְיָד חֲזָקָה׃

But they replied, “You shall not pass through!” And Edom went out against them in heavy force, strongly armed.

Par. Chukat, where the king of Edom denies Moses' request to travel through their territory. Edom is to the south and east of the Dead Sea, and the Kings' Highway, the major N–S route through the Transjordan, cuts through it. The highway is mentioned explicitly in v. 17. See the map here: If Jacob Is Returning to Canaan, Why Send Messengers to Esau in Seir? by Dr. David Ben-Gad HaCohen.

Deut 20:20

רַק עֵץ אֲשֶׁר־תֵּדַע כִּי־לֹא־עֵץ מַאֲכָל הוּא אֹתוֹ תַשְׁחִית וְכָרָתָּ וּבָנִיתָ מָצוֹר עַל־הָעִיר אֲשֶׁר־הִוא עֹשָׂה עִמְּךָ מִלְחָמָה עַד רִדְתָּהּ׃

Only trees that you know do not yield food may be destroyed; you may cut them down for constructing siegeworks against the city that is waging war on you, until it has been reduced.

Par. Shoftim, a brief (2-verse) law about chopping down trees when waging war against a city. Fruit trees must be spared, whereas non-fruit-bearing trees can be cut down and their wood used to conduct the siege. The previous verse offers a cryptic rationale: "For are trees of the field human to withdraw before you into the besieged town?" But in the wake of v. 16, "you shall not let a soul remain alive," if we spare trees for the reason that they can't withdraw (see Rashi), how much more so human noncombatants who aren't able to escape? See Are Trees of the Field Human? by Dr. Shai Secunda.

Comments

Post a Comment

Not sure how to leave a comment? By "Comment as", either choose your Google ID, OR select "Name/URL". Type your name and leave URL blank (if you don't have a web address). Then hit "Publish", type in the letters/number shown, and again "Publish". I don't mind anonymous comments, but please use a pseudonym.

Popular posts from this blog

Shul - The Place for Interpersonal Mitzvot

Image
People naturally think of shul as being primarily a bein adam lamakom domain ("between a person and God"). But in fact, the opportunities to exercise interpersonal sensitivity in shul are so numerous, so constant, that one could reasonably argue that it's predominantly a bein adam lechavero experience ("between a person and their fellow"). And of course, all our ritual religiosity is just pomp and circumstance (Chapter 1 of Yeshayahu/Isaiah actually calls it "abomination") when that religious behavior isn't built on a foundation of human decency and sensitivity. With that in mind, here's just a partial list of bein adam lechavero opportunities in shul. (Note: I'm referring here to Orthodox davening, but similar principles apply across the board.) Not going to shul if you're sick or contagious, or if you must, keeping a distance from people. Covering your mouth when you sneeze or cough, washing hands after blowing your nose –...
Read more

Tzitzit and the Reminder of Responsibility - Torah portion Shelach

Image
Numbers 15:37-41 presents the commandment of making tzitzit (tassels) on the edges of one's garment. The Torah uses the word " kanaf " to describe the location on the garment the tzitzit is to be made. Many translate kanaf as corner [1], though lexicons also suggest edge, extremity, extension, hem, wing or skirt. [2] As Jacob Milgrom points out, there are numerous ancient Near Eastern reliefs in which certain people are depicted with tassels on the hems of their garments. These hems are displayed as scalloped, cut like an umbrella, where arches meet at points around the circumference. That meeting point is where the tassels project, and the tassels are in fact extensions of the embroidery of the hem, rather than strings added as attachments. The tassels would either hang by themselves or have flowers or bells embroidered at the tips. [3] The below relief found at the Medinet Habu mortuary temple of Ramesses III depicts what might have been the original tzitzit . ...
Read more

Hooves and Cud: Criteria or Preexisting Taboo? - Torah portion Shemini

Image
It's so gratifying to find an author who speaks your language, who addresses the topics you want addressed and poses the questions you want asked. That's been my experience reading Jacob Milgrom's commentary on Leviticus. And his section on pure/impure animals is no exception. Non-kosher animals and food taboos A line of thought occurred to me about the "kosher signs" - e.g. split hooves and rumination for quadrupeds - that maybe these signs were chosen after the fact. Perhaps there was a long-standing tradition about what animals the early Israelites would eat, and which ones they found detestable, i.e. had a taboo against. (Sheep, goat and bovine domestication, after all, go back roughly 10,000 years, and pig domestication nearly 13,000 years.) And only later did the Priestly school devise a rule to fit the existing taboo, in effect painting a target around a set of previously shot arrows. My sense is that our drive to offer "explanations" oft...
Read more